Jump to content

Welcome to the Ford Transit Connect Forum

Welcome to the Ford Transit Connect Forum - the largest Ford Transit forum discussion board.  Like most online communities, you must register to post and take advantage of other features that this community has to offer, but don't worry this is a simple free process that requires minimal information for you to signup. Be apart of Ford Transit Connect Forum by signing in or creating an account.
• Receive special product discounts
• Invitations to events
• Start new topics and reply to others
• Subscribe to topics and forums to get email updates
• Get your own profile page and make new friends
• Send personal messages to other members
• Create an album and post photos. . .More!

Click here to create an account now.

 

transit connect guest message logo.png


   
  •  
    Custom Search





jrm223

General Grabber AT2 upgrade

Recommended Posts

So, my van is at a tire shop right now getting an upgrade to General Grabber AT2 all-terrains. Stock tires have 70K on them and are pretty well worn-down, one pair is at the wear bars and the other pair has a little bit left before the wear bars. I ordered 215/65R16 so I can gain 1/2" extra ground clearance because I scrape too often - but, of course, WalMart wouldn't put them on since they aren't stock-size. I ordered online since they weren't in-stock at my local store. Their worker told me "The tires are 6.67% bigger (I know that, I want more ground clearance) and your van is spec'd for extra-load capacity tires and the tires you bought are standard-load." I looked up the tire specs and Ford's axle specs (GAWR) - my van has 2716lb GAWR for each axle and the tires are rated 1653/ea thus 3306/pair?! 590lbs more capacity then the axle is rated for, but they're not high enough load capacity, that's hilarious!

 

Anywho, pics later after I get the van back. I'll have to schedule a service visit with Ford to reprogram computer for the new tire size and I also still need to get the door latch recall done. Hopefully these tires will help me not get stuck in my own yard like the stock ones did in spring of 2016... Had to get pulled out of my own yard, lol.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
 

Are you reprogramming the tires for speedo calibration?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It'll be 70K before you'll know if the Generals were an 'upgrade' or not . . . . won't it?

 

Hopefully they can reprogram the transmission shift points  -  That would be a bigger issue to me than the speedo

 

Don

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I went from 215/55/16 size tire to 215/60/16 size tires.  The Ride improved  The speedometer error was marginal and the Transmission Shift quality and performance are unchanged. 

jrm233 I want a full up date on the driving impressions . Please keep track of the possible Scrub issues.  I am very happy with the changes I made  to My TC

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Well, one of my clients called as I was walking to the shop to pick up my van, so I didn't get any pics before the sun was down. After a couple miles around town, I barely hear more noise over the Continentals that came off, but I've had trucks with actual mud tires so naturally these AT's are a lot quieter than those. Highest speed around town is also 45MPH, so there might be a bit more noise once I'm going faster on the way home (70MPH between towns).

 

MRTN, I'm planning on bringing it to Ford to get reprogrammed (hopefully, but we all  know how tech's and SM's can be about these things) and I still need to get that door latch recall taken care of, so I'll need to schedule it to make sure they have the new latch first.

 

Beta Don, if these tires don't get stuck in my own yard, they'll be an instant improvement, lol. Although that only happened once. That said, they should also have less tendency to spin even on drive pavement, one issue that the Conti's had since new since they're such a hard compound. As for the trans shift points, I would think there wouldn't be a need to change them as long as the vehicle knows the actual road speed via correcting the tire size in the computer, but maybe I'm thinking about that wrong, idk. On trucks in the past, I put 33's on one that had like 29's stock and I shifted the manual (1989 F150 4.9L 4-speed granny) at the same RPM's as always. Also had swapped the stock 265/75R16's to 315/75R16's (31.6" to 34.6", 9.5% difference) on my 2003 F350 and didn't make any adjustments to the computer or auto trans there. The tire increase on my TC2 is only 6.7% increase, in comparison.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I really didn't notice any increase in road noise up to 75MPH on the way home and I don't have any rear interior, either - no foam/vinyl floor, no plastic panels, etc. So mine is already a bit noisier than most cargo vans here, but not loud by any means. I did get one pic before leaving work with a parking lot light plus camera flash for some brightness.

 

WP_20171221_001.jpg

Edit: Oh yea, I also noticed they don't break traction as much on pavement or gravel. Same situations that had the traction control going crazy before, even when the Conti's were younger & meatier than now.

Edited by jrm223

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you for the up date.

I think  the  Transmission control computer adapts the shift patterns automatically.  The only priority is the speedometer error is important. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
10 hours ago, jrm223 said:

I really didn't notice any increase in road noise up to 75MPH on the way home and I don't have any rear interior, either - no foam/vinyl floor, no plastic panels, etc. So mine is already a bit noisier than most cargo vans here, but not loud by any means. I did get one pic before leaving work with a parking lot light plus camera flash for some brightness.

 

WP_20171221_001.jpg

Edit: Oh yea, I also noticed they don't break traction as much on pavement or gravel. Same situations that had the traction control going crazy before, even when the Conti's were younger & meatier than now.

 

Your new tires look great! I am curious tho.....in your first post you stated Walmart "would not" mount these tires. So, who installed the tires? At first glance you are correct that the weight rating on the new tires are over. LT tires when used on a SUV, light pickup or van use the full tire weight rating. P tires on the other hand used in the same application (load carrying vehicles, not pass cars) can only use 90% of the rating. The other issue is tire pressure. My van placard states rear tires to be inflated to 48#, while the Grabber AT2 215/65R16 states a max of 45# (info from tirerack) and the OEM Continental's are 51# max. The legalities are too overwhelming! 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I had to bring them to another shop in town to get mounted since Walmart wouldn't do it because of corporate liability policies with the oversize and "underweight" aspects. It's been awhile since I looked, but I think my van shows 42F and 45R PSI on the sticker; I'll have to check that again in a bit. I always inflate all four to around 42-43PSI since I don't generally carry anywhere near full-load capacity. So far the tire pressure light has not popped up, so they must have put enough air in to make the computer happy, anyway.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The Tire psi max is to insure that the tire will perform at the rated  load .  The placard  it there to make sure the supplied tires are not run with too little pressure for the load.  The new tires carry the same psi to rated load .  The tire will carry the load  at the indicated psi.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Okay, I remembered wrong for my tire sticker - it's 44F & 48R, but I do roughly 44 all-around. I don't have a gauge with me to check the current pressure, though. The second pic is the back-edge of the driver side, closest to the door; I can get my fingers through the gap. Second pic is front-edge of passenger side by the bumper, a little more room up there.

WP_20171222_001.jpg

WP_20171222_002.jpg

WP_20171222_003.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

WalMart has been a real stickler to exactly follow what's on the door jamb sticker for at least the last 20  years.  I've got a Miata which came with 185/60R14 tires and back in the day, running high performance Bridgestone RE-71's (developed as an OEM tire for Porsche) in 195/55R14 tires was the 'performance upgrade' for those who occasionally auto-crossed their cars  -  A really 'sticky' tire.   Because Bridgestone made that tire in that size specifically as the OEM tire for one of the little Japanese sport sedans, it was a really popular upgrade for Miata enthusiasts.  Same load rating, same overall circumference, but WalMart would not mount them . . . . unless I brought them just the wheels and not the car!

 

The next years Miata came out with super lightweight 15 inch wheels and 195/50R15's which are the same load rating and the same overall circumference as the 185/60R14's that came on my car.  Since performance rubber in ANY 14" size was getting scarcer than hen's teeth, I 'upgraded' to the 15" wheels and the 195/50R15's, again hauling just the wheels and my new tires over to WalMart to get them mounted and balanced

 

So long as I brought them only the wheels/tires and not the car, they were happy to mount them for me.  *IF* there was ever an accident causing death which might in any way be attributed to the improper size or load ratings of the tires, the first company named in the ensuing lawsuit would be the one with the deepest pockets, namely WalMart, so they just won't do it  -  Probably as a direct result of a lawsuit in the past

 

For your General Grabber AT2's, th load rating (98) is actually *greater* than the OEM Continentals (97) you took off  -  The only 'legal' stickler is the speed rating.  The Continentals were rated H, which is 130 mph, while the Generals are rated T which is 118 mph

 

Don

Edited by Beta Don

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yeah, WalMart is a PITA when it comes to tires. They did not want to mount winter tires on my old RX7 without mounting them on all four tires. I brought them the tires and wheels by themselves and they mounted them. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, Boomerweps said:

Yeah, WalMart is a PITA when it comes to tires. They did not want to mount winter tires on my old RX7 without mounting them on all four tires. I brought them the tires and wheels by themselves and they mounted them. 

 

With a rear-wheel drive like that, I can understand them wanting to do all four. What good is it being able to get moving if you can't steer well? lol, now a front-wheel drive it'd be less of a concern to have all four snow tires. Back tires would help stop, but not much help to move or steer.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


×